I’ve just been doing my armchair activism for the night. Having read, and been horrified by, the details of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), I emailed my 5 MEPs to share that same feeling of horror. Here’s what I wrote (heavily adapted from the Open Rights Group‘s standard letter):
Dear <Name>
I’m writing to share my concerns over the ongoing secret negotiations surrounding the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), and to urge you to stand against this opaque process.
The European Commission, the US, and eleven other countries (including several involved in systematic censorship at home the UAE, Singapore, and South Korea), have been negotiating the ACTA in secret for over two years. The proposed ACTA will be a global plurilateral agreement aiming to establish international standards over the counterfeiting of goods, generic medicines and online copyright infringement.
It is, of course, important that intellectual property is protected, and that those who research and develop products are able to make an appropriate return on their investments. However, I am extremely concerned that the ACTA, as proposed in recently released draft text, will threaten important, hard-won freedom of expression, stifle competition and access to generic medicines so important for poorer people and nations, and introduce overly harsh punishments for those who fall under its remit.
I am especially worried by the nature of the negotiations, which have become well advanced in secret, and cannot be subject to the proper scrutiny of the many, many people this agreement will impact if it comes in to force. I strongly believe the process needs to be much more open, and to be negotiated under one of the existing international bodies – such as the UN or WTO, rather than creating yet another international framework. It’s also key that the positions of individual countries are known, so that European citizens know what their governments are doing in their names. This is especially important when the ACTA proposes to allow law enforcement agencies to force Internet Service Providers to disclose personal usage data without a warrant, in direct violation of the UDHR Article 11. The proposed agreement would also provide for a 3-strikes clause for internet access disconnection, despite the fact that internet connections are usually shared, are near crucial for education in the modern world, and the fact that internet access is considered by many a fundamental human right.
I urge you to sign Written Declaration 12/2010 tabled by Françoise Castex, Zuzana Roithová, Alexander Alvaro, Stavros Lambrinidis which calls for greater transparency of the ACTA process.
Among other things Written Declaration 12/2010
- calls on the European Commission to immediately release all ACTA related documents
- states that ACTA should not limit judicial due process or weaken fundamental rights and data protection
- emphasises that Internet Service Providers should not be liable for the data they transmit
- states that the access to generic medicines should not be impededIn March MEPs overwhelmingly approved a common resolution opposing the ACTA negotiations process. By signing Written Declaration 12/2010 you ensure that the call for transparency remains a top priority and put pressure on the European Commission to bring up the issue at the next ACTA round in Switzerland.
Thanks very much.
Yours, Josh Heald
If you’re anything like me, you’ll agree that this sort of thing transcends party boundaries, and requires the people to say no, as one, to any abuse of the power that we have entrusted to our governments. If you agree, the ORG’s tool makes it nice and easy to make your views clear to your MEPs. I encourage you to make the time to read about the issues and write an email of your own, but if you can’t, sending the form letters is better than nothing.










